The Kimputing Blog

" Our test suite passed," the developer announced. The business analyst looked at the console output - pages of cryptic assertions, stack traces, and technical jargon. "Great," she replied. "But what did it actually test?" The developer scrolled through the logs, searching for something human-readable. Nothing. This scene repeats itself everywhere. We've invested heavily in test automation, but the reports speak only to those who wrote the tests. Business analysts, project ma

The thesis that "manual testing will be a cheaper and more effective method than automation" continues to appear in testing discussions, webinars, and publications. This perspective represents a widespread but oversimplified view of software quality economics. While manual testing offers lower hourly rates and immediate deployment, this perspective fails to account for the complexities of scale, the many scenarios where automation isn't merely preferable but essential, and mo

We've all seen it happen. The developers on the team excitedly discuss the latest framework they're implementing, while the test automation engineers quietly stick to the same Selenium scripts they've been maintaining for years. It's a strange disconnect – the very people who should be at the forefront of technological validation often trail behind when it comes to evolving their own toolset. Let's be honest: many of us in test automation have become too comfortable with our